Comments on: Packershow Season 4 Episode 6: Show 58 http://packershow.berserkerproductions.com/archives/180 a Green Bay Packers podcast for fans, by fans Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:26:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: John Morgan http://packershow.berserkerproductions.com/archives/180/comment-page-1#comment-544 John Morgan Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:35:14 +0000 http://packershow.berserkerproductions.com/?p=180#comment-544 Of course I mean 'weak' instead of 'week'. Is there anyway we can edit our comments? Of course I mean ‘weak’ instead of ‘week’. Is there anyway we can edit our comments?

]]> By: John Morgan http://packershow.berserkerproductions.com/archives/180/comment-page-1#comment-543 John Morgan Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:34:09 +0000 http://packershow.berserkerproductions.com/?p=180#comment-543 Good show guys. Thought you were going to go all negative after the first fifteen minutes or so, but gradually you began to see things in a better light. As I look back at the first three games of the season, I think the Packers have shown a certain progression that bodes well. A hard-fought division game, a sloppy let-down game against a surprise contender and a laugher against a very week team is just the kind of experience this team needs to make a long-term run for the division title. I posted in the forums my thoughts about the game this Monday, but I don't see the Packers losing it. Your emphasis on special teams was spot-on though. Good show guys. Thought you were going to go all negative after the first fifteen minutes or so, but gradually you began to see things in a better light.

As I look back at the first three games of the season, I think the Packers have shown a certain progression that bodes well. A hard-fought division game, a sloppy let-down game against a surprise contender and a laugher against a very week team is just the kind of experience this team needs to make a long-term run for the division title.

I posted in the forums my thoughts about the game this Monday, but I don’t see the Packers losing it. Your emphasis on special teams was spot-on though.

]]>